Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins
Volver al index del foro
Enviar un mensaje en este tema
Airfleets es un sitio internacional, el foro está disponible en Inglés solamente. Así que gracias a expresarse en la idioma de Shakespeare.
FLX Miembro desde: 26 Apr 2007 Mensajes: 3976 |
|
Asunto: Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins - Enviado el 05 Jul 0:53 Well, it's more an official computer-generated image than an actual photo of the 789, 7810, 778X and 779X flying in formation. Scroll down to the bottom of this link to see the image: http://www.aspireaviation.com/2013/07/02/boeing-777x-787-10-show-the-lure-of-the-x-factor/ More tech details+data re 7810 and 77X also included in this link. The most interesting tech bits I hv learnt fm this article: 1. L3 door placement and L4 door size on both 77Xs 2. 40 LD3s in the 7810's belly(2 more than the 388 is capable of) |
|
 |
Perfil del usuario |  |
Mensaje privado |  |
Sugerir supresión |
captain bill Miembro desde: 07 Oct 2006 Número de mensajes: 5808 |
|
Asunto: Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins - Enviado el 05 Jul 9:17 A most informative link, thanks FLX. I have found much more information here than on the other sites I have looked at but I reckon we will still have folks on this forum asking things like >how many passengers will it be able to take< |
|
|
Perfil del usuario | |
Mensaje privado | |
Sugerir supresión |
|
FLX Miembro desde: 26 Apr 2007 Número de mensajes: 3976 |
|
Asunto: Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins - Enviado el 05 Jul 11:55 captain bill: No problem. Though I admit there is a typo in my earlier comment: <1. L3 door placement and L4 door size on both 77Xs> I meant R3 and R4 because the image shows the 77Xs' starboard side. I found them interesting because L/R3 door on a very large widebody with 10 exits(e.g. 744, 77W, 346, 388, 3510) are usually located over the wing and none of those 10 exits are usually in a reduced size such as for the 77X. |
|
|
Perfil del usuario | |
Mensaje privado | |
Sugerir supresión |
aceform1127 Miembro desde: 05 May 2011 Número de mensajes: 47 |
|
Asunto: Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins - Enviado el 16 Jul 9:52 I got drooling eyes as I was reading the link. Thanks FLX! I meant it. Thanks! |
|
|
Perfil del usuario | |
Mensaje privado | |
Sugerir supresión |
Dulles_Flyer Miembro desde: 26 Jun 2025 Número de mensajes: |
|
Asunto: Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins - Enviado el 16 Jul 12:46 Great article FLX. I found it very interesting how many are discounting the 777-8X (especially saying it has more range than airlines need), yet it is a natural replacement for existing 772ERs, and is far more capable that the 351 in all the categories that matter, and airbus still has not released more definitive numbers on it, too. I am glad they went into more detail about the folding wingtips, since it has been a topic of discussion in the past. Should work just fine. That last image of the long-haul family is impressive. That wing flex is amazing!!! |
|
|
Perfil del usuario | |
Mensaje privado | |
Sugerir supresión |
|
FLX Miembro desde: 26 Apr 2007 Número de mensajes: 3976 |
|
Asunto: Full family of 4 picture of Boeing's future widebody twins - Enviado el 17 Jul 3:01 aceform1127: No problem. aspireaviation.com has been a pretty good/reliable source re predictions about upcoming products either side(Airbus and Boeing). Dulles_Flyer: <<...interesting how many are discounting the 777-8X (especially saying it has more range than airlines need)>> Probably in the context of how relatively few 77L and 345, spiritual predecessors of the 778X(And 359R if Airbus ever launch this concept), hv been sold since they became available. They hv achieved far less than 100units of order each so far. <<it is a natural replacement for existing 772ERs>> Disagree. 778X is more a replacement for 77L in terms of capabilities albeit in a size much closer to 77W than to the 772ER/77L. Basically, the strategy is to use more seats to split the hi fuel burn per trip of the 77L today in order to help improve fuel burn per seat on ultra-long sectors(16-20hrs or above). <<far more capable that the 351 in all the categories that matter>> The hottest debate right now about 778X vs 351(Both @ almost identical seat count) is what is more important to MORE operators: 1) More payload/range of the 778X due to optimization towards a more capable(Or beefed-up), semi-clean sheet platform. or 2) More fuel efficiency of the 351 due to a completely clean sheet design(Lighter). If U swap Boeing's and Airbus's product strategies as described above, it's almost exactly the same debate in reverse between 359 vs 7810(Though both are completely clean-sheet designs in this case). I believe the British expression would be <tit for tat>. It's another example showing why I hv been saying for yrs on this forum how Airbus and Boeing are more similar than most folks believe. <<glad they went into more detail about the folding wingtips>> I had never thought of how the folding wing design common on aircraft carrier-borne strike fighters(e.g. A6E) could be scaled up for widebody airliners. |
|
|
Perfil del usuario | |
Mensaje privado | |
Sugerir supresión |
Enviar un mensaje en este tema
Los mensajes deben ser escritos en Español . Los mensajes escritos en otro idioma serán borrados.
Enviar sólo los mensajes relacionados con la aviación civil, y no introduzca ningún anuncio. Your IP se guarda en el registro.
Usted puede costumbre su texto utilizando los siguientes códigos
[B] Tu texto [/B]: El texto en negrita
[I] Tu texto [/I]: El texto en cursiva
[U] Su texto [/U]: Texto subrayar
[S] Su texto [/S]: Texto striketough